The World Economic Forum in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland is addressing numerous initiatives of global importance. Despite, being an invite only forum reserved for members of the Forum’s communities “the World Economic Forum is an independent and impartial International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation. Uh? According to their website’s about page the World Economic Forum “does not promote any political, commercial or personal interests, nor does it use the names of its participants for promotional purposes. In fact, the forum aims to be inclusive “through broad international media participation, televised sessions and webcasts, and through the Forum’s millions of followers social media.

So, the World Economic Forum is an invite only, inclusive and independent meeting that does not promote political, commercial, or personal interests and achieves meaningful impact as one of the greatest followed media events outside of the world of sport. Wack.

The World Economic Forum sounds like the United Nations and that is not a good thing. Even though the United Nations is a great organization in theory the practice and scope of influence the organization has on its member states and non-member states is limited. So limited in fact it raises the question, how can the UN be effective?

The United Nations Charter, Chapter 1: Articles and Principles, Article 1:1, states: To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace; and Article 2:7 states: Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.

Both organizations preach solutions but do not have the ability to enforce solutions. Both organization are symbols for peace but do little to enact peace. They claim to be impartial but are subject to the lifeline that we all are, money. Society can applaud and praise the organizations in their ideologies however, one must insist that without a means to an end they are merely puppets of the rich and wealthy to mask a lack of action against poverty and pollution.

And to end poverty and pollution, citizens of the world need to create an organization that is not owned, run, and polluted by the rich and wealthy. That’s not to say those with money are incapable of operating an organization aimed at ending poverty and pollution but it is to say there is a strong conflict of interest. When 26 people own as much as 3.8 billion, there is a STRONG conflict of interest.

The Human Rights Union, with your help, can address this plaguing issue of poverty and pollution. As a union of citizens nation and worldwide, we can plan solutions to providing citizens with basic needs. Trying to fix poverty with money is a STRONG conflict of interest. That’s why the Human Rights Union is proposing complete separation of basic needs and economic reliance. Immediately!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.